The MMR vaccination debate – Analysis through the Schwarz and Thompson framework
نویسندگان
چکیده
The measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination was first introduced in the UK in 1988 [1]. Since then, cases of measles, mumps and rubella has steadily declined to very low rates [2]. Prior to its UK introduction, MMR has been in regular used in the US since 1972 and Scandinavia since 1982 [3] plus a number of European countries have adopted its usage. The wealth of experience that exists globally suggest that MMR is the best way to immunise children against these diseases. However, in 1998, Dr Andrew Wakefield published a paper linking the MMR injection with autism[4]. It caused public outcry which demanded the government to rethink its strategy to giving single vaccinations instead of the triple version. The debate between the risk of the MMR vaccination is still visible. Vaccinations of MMR has fallen to the rate of 82% the lowest figure since 1989 [5].
منابع مشابه
Overview of aseptic meningitis after MMR vaccination in a group of Iranian infants in Children’s Medical Center
Background: CNS infection can be focal or generalized. Meningitis, besides other etiologies, can occur after a viral infection or viral vaccine. Although meningitis can occur in at any age but it is more common in children less than five years old. Aseptic meningitis and meningoencephalitis are two of the most common complications of mumps (wild type or vaccine). As a result of their serious co...
متن کاملمقایسه سطح آنتی بادی و تعداد واکسن MMR کودکان زیر سه سال بستری در مرکز پزشکی افضلی پور کرمان
Received: 15 Aug, 2012 Accepted: 19 Oct, 2012 Abstract : Background & Aims: Measles, rubella and mumps vaccination prevented the viral diseases threatening children during the recent decades. The incidences of these diseases in countries with high vaccination coverage have reduced significantly. Initial vaccination was as a single dose and then two dose vaccination was introduced. This chan...
متن کاملPregnancy outcome following M.MR vaccination
Lorzadeh N1, Ghafarzadeh M1, Vahabi S2, Lashgar-ara GhR3 1. Assistant professor, Department of gynecology, Faculty of medicine, Lorestan University of medical sciences 2. Assistant profwssor, Department of anesthesiology, Faculty of medicine, Lorestan University of medical sciences 3. General practitioner, Information and drugs center of Lorestan health department Abstract Background...
متن کاملA Linguistic Analysis of the Online Debate on Vaccines and Use of Fora as Information Stations and Confirmation Niche
This study looks at the communication between users concerning health risks, with the aim of exploring their use of fora and assessing whether participants establish a niche with like-minded users during these exchanges. By integrating a corpus linguistic approach with content analysis and multiple studies on computer mediated health discourse, this study analyses the intense attention paid to ...
متن کاملA Contrastive Investigation of Intertextuality in Research Articles Authored by Iranian vs. English Writers in Applied Linguistics
Academic discourse enables others' voices in a text to be realized through conventionalized citational patterns. However, form amongst a variety of factors, one thing which may influence the way others' voices are textualized is writers' affiliations to different cultures. Following this assumption, the present contrastive study attempted to explore manifest intertextual constructions across th...
متن کامل